Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bennett v. State Board of Examiners

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1909No. 2,807PublishedCited by 17 opinions

■Original proceeding by tbe state, on tbe relation of Willard Bennett, against tbe State Board of Examiners for an injunction. Judgment for defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly

Original application for an injunction. The complaint sets forth the following statement of facts as a foundation for the relief sought: That the defendant, the state board of examiners, consisting of the other persons joined as defendants, is vested under the state Constitution with the power to examine all claims against the state, except salaries or compensations of officers fixed by law, and to authorize the payment of such claims out of appropriations made by the legislature for this purpose; that the plaintiff is a resident of the state and the owner of real and personal property within…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. HollandMontana Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bonner v. DixonMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. State Ex Rel. Toomey v. State Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Ex Parte SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. State Ex Rel. Tipton v. EricksonMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Herrin v. EricksonMontana Supreme Court · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API