Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Tipton v. Erickson
Montana Supreme Court
Decided February 18, 1933No. 7,125PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion:
PER CURIAM'.
This is a taxpayer’s suit to enjoin the state board of examiners and the members thereof from carrying into execution the provisions of House Bill No. 22, approved February 9, 1933 [Chap. 10, Laws 1933]. The complaint alleges that the Act is unconstitutional in various respects, but that nevertheless, unless restrained, the board will proceed thereunder. The defendant board has demurred to the complaint upon the ground that the same does not state facts sufficient to entitle the plaintiff to the relief sought.
The Act empowers the state board of examiners to issue and sell…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- McCullough v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Hill v. RaeMontana Supreme Court · 1916
- State v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1919
- Woodruff v. TrapnallSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State Ex Rel. City of Missoula v. HolmesMontana Supreme Court · 1935
- State v. DriscollMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. StarkMontana Supreme Court · 1935
- Nicholson v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- Martin v. State Highway CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1939
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.