Legal Opinion

Hebert v. Hebert

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 12, 1980No. 79-335PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

In January 1975, both Suzanne and Michael Hebert were fatally injured in an automobile accident. The plaintiff, as administratrix of the decedents’ estates, brought these tort actions against the defendants pursuant to the survival statute, RSA 556:9-14. Because the plaintiff failed to commence these actions within the two-year period mandated by RSA 556:11, each of the defendants moved to dismiss. Following a hearing, the Superior Court (Wyman, J.) granted the defendants’ motions and reserved and transferred the plaintiff’s exceptions to this court. We affirm.

The issue for review is whether…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gaudette v. WebbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  2. Mihoy v. ProulxSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  3. Tanner v. KingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1960
  4. Heath v. ClevelandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1963

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. Gould v. Concord HospitalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  3. Park v. Rockwell International Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  4. Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  5. Cheever v. Southern New Hampshire Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API