Legal Opinion

Tanner v. King

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 27, 1960No. 4794PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.

RSA 556:19 provides that “Any person interested in the estate of a person deceased may begin an action as administrator, which shall not be abated nor the attachment lost because such person is not administrator, nor by his decease, if the administrator then or afterward appointed shall, at the first or second term of the court, indorse the writ and prosecute it as plaintiff.”

The question to be decided is whether the plaintiff who began this action for wrongful death as a “person interested in the estate” can prosecute it to a conclusion in that capacity or must it be prosecuted by an…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mihoy v. ProulxSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  2. Hebert v. HebertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  3. Ransmeier v. Camp Cody, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. Porter v. Dartmouth CollegeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2010
  5. Barden Culbreth, as Executor of the Estate of William Charles Rowan v. Edmond L. Macri, Jr.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API