Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Becker

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1936No. Civ. 10885PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment against the plaintiffs in an action brought against the defendants for the purpose of quieting title to certain real property. At one time the defendants owned the property and during the period of their ownership executed a promissory note and a mortgage securing the same in favor of a Los Angeles bank. Thereafter they sold the property to F. 0. Paige and wife, who executed a promissory note and a second trust deed upon the property in favor of defendants. The trust deed was junior and subject to the mortgage. Thereafter the Paiges conveyed the property to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dam v. ZinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Hitchcock v. RooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Biurrun v. ElizaldeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Hannah v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Vasey v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Frank v. HowichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API