Legal Opinion

Salitan v. Carter, Ealey and Dinwiddie

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1960No. 22902PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Judge.

This is an action by Samuel Salitan and Irving Jacobs, alleged general partners, doing business as Credit Industrial Company, plaintiff-appellant, to recover from defendant-respondent, Carter, Ealey and Dinwiddie, a corporation, on three negotiable trade acceptances in the face amount of $1,544, and interest.

The case was tried to a jury. It was defendant’s contention, among others, in its pleading and throughout the trial that Sterling Materials Company, Inc., the payee of the instruments, was a New York corporation and was not legally qualified to do business in Missouri; that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Tri-State Amusement Co. v. Forest Park Highlands Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  2. Outdoor Electric Advertising, Inc. v. SaurageSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  3. United Shoe Machinery Co. v. RamloseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  4. Booth v. ScottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  5. Modern Industrial Bank v. TaubSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. National Merchandising Corporation v. McAlpinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Beal v. Industrial CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Credit Industrial Company v. Happel, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  4. May Department Stores, Inc. v. Supervisor of Liquor ControlMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Kedzie & 103rd Currency Exchange, Inc. v. HodgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API