United Shoe Machinery Co. v. Ramlose
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court. — Eon. E. M. Bearing, Judge. (1) The amended petition does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The petition alleges that the plaintiff is a Maine corporation. It does not allege that it has complied with the laws of this State. A foreign corporation that has not complied with the laws of this State cannot maintain an action in this .State.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court. — Eon. E. M. Bearing, Judge. (1) The amended petition does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The petition alleges that the plaintiff is a Maine corporation. It does not allege that it has complied with the laws of this State. A foreign corporation that has not complied with the laws of this State cannot maintain an action in this .State. Tri-State Amusement Co. v. Amusement Co., 192 Mo. 404; State ex inf. v. Standard Oil Co., 194 Mo. 124; Mill & Lumber Co. v. Sims, 197 Mo. 507; Wilson-Moline Buggy Co. v. Priebe, 100 S. W. 558;…
1Opinion of the Court
BURGESS, J. —
This is an action in replevin, begun in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis on April 8, 1903, to recover certain shoe-making machinery. On application of the defendant the venue of the action was changed to St. Louis county, and thereafter, on application of the plaintiff, the venue was changed to Jefferson county. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for the possession of all the machines specified in the petition, and the sum of one dollar damages, from which judgment, after ineffectual motions for new trial and in arrest, defendant appealed.
Plai…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- President of the Bank of the United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Harris v. RunnelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Pangborn v. WestlakeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Tri-State Amusement Co. v. Forest Park Highlands Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Donovan v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- State Ex Rel. Connecticut Fire Insurance v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- State ex rel. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. GrimmSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- International Text-Book Co. v. GillespieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- United Shoe Machinery Co. v. RamloseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.