Legal Opinion
People v. Ruggles
California Supreme Court
Decided July 5, 1985No. Crim. 22994PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRODIN, J.
Defendant David Wendell Ruggles was charged with (1) robbery (Pen. Code, § 211) with use of a firearm (Pen. Code, § 12022.5) and (2) possession of a firearm by an ex-felon (Pen. Code, § 12021). The information was amended to charge six prior convictions and the case was consolidated with a second case in which a single count of robbery was charged. Defendant pleaded not guilty, denied the priors, and moved to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5). Following hearing and denial of the motion to suppress, a plea bargain was negotiated whereby defendant withdrew his not guilty…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- People v. CamachoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. BuzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- John Matthew Toomey v. Bill J. Bunnell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- State v. JuarezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. LeBlancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.