People v. Camacho
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
Police in this case looked through a window and observed defendant packaging cocaine in his home. The officers made this *828observation while standing in defendant’s side yard, a place they had no legal right to be. The Court of Appeal held the police violated defendant’s right to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and, accordingly, concluded the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence against him. We affirm.
Facts
On June 26, 1997, police received an anonymous complaint of a…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- People v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- ALLIANCE TITLE COMPANY, INC. v. BoucherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- State v. PetersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- In re RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. H.M.California Court of Appeal · 2008
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.