Legal Opinion
State v. Juarez
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided July 5, 1995No. 15416PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOSSON, Judge.
Defendant appeals his conviction for receiving stolen property after a conditional guilty plea. We analyze the following questions: (1) where there are incriminating statements both before and after Miranda warnings are administered, whether the post-Miranda statements are still admissible; and (2) where the trial court errs in denying a motion to suppress pre-Miranda statements, whether Defendant’s conviction from a plea agreement can still stand. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for new proceedings consistent with this opinion. FACTS
On October 9, 1993,…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Spano v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. DeGraffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. NietoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. GuthrieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. SwaniganSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.