Legal Opinion

United States v. Dickerson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 3, 1940No. 705PublishedCited by 264 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

The question is whether respondent, Dickerson, may recover a judgment against the United States upon a cause of action founded upon § 9 of the Act of June 10, 1922, c. 212, 42 Stat. 625, 629-630.

Section 9 provides that after the 1st of July, 1922, an enlistment allowance shall be paid “to every honorably discharged enlisted man . . . who re-enlists within a period of three months from the date of his discharge.” Respondent, who was honorably discharged upon the termination of an enlisted period ending on the 21st of July, 1938, re-enlisted on the following day, the 22nd, for a period of three…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brewster v. GageSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
  3. Boston Sand and Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Pirie v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Crawford v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by264 opinions

  1. United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. LovettSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. United States v. WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Association of Westinghouse Salaried Employees v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955

259 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API