Legal Opinion

Acme Fur Dressing Co. v. United States

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 4, 1948No. Civil Action No. 8612Published

1Opinion of the Court

GALSTON, District Judge.

The matter for decision involves two cross motions, that by the plaintiff for part summary judgment, and that of the defendant for summary judgment, both pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. These motions will be disposed of in one opinion.

The action is for $32,042.24, brought under the War Contracts Hardship Claims Act of August 7, 1946, 41 U.S.C.A. § 106 note, for losses claimed to have been sustained under a contract of the petitioner with the War Department Army Air Forces. The contract was made in April, 1942, and related to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fogarty v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API