Legal Opinion

State v. Vane

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1919No. 15060PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Blake, J., entered April 3, 1918, upon a trial and conviction of larceny.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Appellant, by a jury, was found guilty of the crime of grand larceny, on account of stealing a team of mares of the alleged value of $450, the property of Cunningham Brothers. From the judgment and sentence thereon, this appeal has been prosecuted..

It appears that one Carl Brink stole the horses, having been aided and abetted therein by the appellant, who was proceeded against as- a principal under the provisions of Bern. Code, §§ 2007 and 2260. In the trial of Carl Brink for the larceny in Pend Oreille *423county, appellant acted as a witness in support of the defense of an alibi. Later in that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. State v. PettitWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State v. MannWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. State v. KleinWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. State v. PettitWashington Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BixbyWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State v. GoodwinWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API