Legal Opinion

State v. Pettit

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1913No. 11162PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Kellogg, J., entered June 22, 1912, upon a trial and conviction of grand larceny.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

Appellant was jointly indicted with her husband1 upon a charge of grand larceny. After a separate trial and a judgment of conviction, she has appealed to this court.

The evidence is substantially the same as that given at the trial of her husband, and we will not undertake to restate the facts, but content ourselves by referring to the case *68of State v. Pettit, 74 Wash. 510, 133 Pac. 1014. All of the questions raised in this case were settled in our former opinion, except the following:

The sum of money originally possessed by Mrs. Martin, the prosecuting witness, was $3,197. The amount…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. PettitWashington Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Pueblo v. López LafontSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
  3. State v. VaneWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. People v. López LafontSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API