Keith Austin Smith v. Donald E. Bordenkircher, Warden of West Virginia Penitentiary
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge:
Arguing that a jury instruction given at his 1979 trial in the Circuit Court of Raleigh County, West Virginia violated his right to due process by defining “reasonable doubt” as a “good and substantial doubt ... and one for which he who entertains such a doubt should be able to give a good and substantial reason,” Keith Austin Smith appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We conclude that the challenged instruction, though troubling in two significant respects, did not deprive Smith of a fair trial.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. LoveCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Aaron HeadspethCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Paul Adkins, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Henry A. Crockett, United States of America v. Thressa CrewsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Winegeart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.