Legal Opinion
United States v. Love
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided July 3, 1985No. Nos. 83-5171(L), 83-5172 to 83-5174 and 84-5262PublishedCited by 146 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Circuit Judge:
Newby Franklin Love, Sue Robinson Youngblood, and Robert Edward Lee appeal from their convictions after a two-week jury trial on a nineteen-count superseding indictment alleging various drug related offenses. Specifically, the three appellants were convicted of violating the federal racketeering statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), (d) (1982), (i.e. the “RICO” statute) together with various federal drug laws, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), 846, 952(a), 960, 963 (1982).1 In addition, Love and Young-blood were also convicted of violating the Travel Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1952(a)(3) (1982), and…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by146 opinions
- United States v. Marvin BakerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Robert Peter RussellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. James O. BakkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. James Earl PaivaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.