Legal Opinion

Sallee v. Craddock

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 10, 1931No. 21437PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtOullison, J.

Defendant in error, as plaintiff, instituted suit against plaintiff in error, as defendant, to recover damages alleged to have been received in an automobile accident. Plaintiff’s first cause of action was for damage received personally and second cause of action was damage to his automobile. The defense of defendant was that the accident was due to plaintiff’s own negligence. The case was tried to a jury and resulted in a verdict in favor of plaintiff.

The defendant appeals and alleges as error :

“The refusal of the trial court to give certain requested instructions offered by defendant and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chickasaw Compress Co. v. BowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Slick Oil Co. v. CoffeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Producers' & Refiners' Corp. v. CastileSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Newton v. Okmulgee Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Helmerick & Payne, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API