Legal Opinion
Oltarsh v. Goodyear Fabrics Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 12, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANDELBAUM, District Judge.
The defendant moves for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint in a patent infringement suit pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
The sole ground urged as the basis for the relief sought is that the plaintiffs’ admission as well as the. defendant’s uncontradicted proof establish the invalidity of the plaintiffs’ patent by reason of anticipation by a prior patent.
It is claimed that the design patent of Print Textile Corporation anticipates the plaintiffs’ design patent No. 104,603 for more than…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dubilier Condenser Corporation v. New York Coil Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Jacob Elishewitz & Sons Co. v. Bronston Bros. & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Refractolite Corporation v. Prismo Holding CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- Frank v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Frankel v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1938
3Cited by3 opinions
- Weil v. N. J. Richman Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Chas. Fischer Spring Co. v. Motion Picture Screen & Accessories Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Lip Lure, Inc. v. Bloomingdale Bros.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939