Legal Opinion
Menoken v. Lipnic
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 6, 2018No. Civil Action No. 16–2480 (RMC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge
This is a case in which the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which is the protector of employee rights to equal employment opportunity, is itself charged with violating the legal proscriptions of Title VII. Cassandra M. Menoken, an African-American female, *179was employed by the EEOC for thirty-five years. She complains here of a hostile work environment in retaliation for protected activity and interference with her rights under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehab Act).
The Court has carefully reviewed the record and the parties'…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cassandra Menoken v. Janet DhillonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- Menoken v. LipnicCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Jasmine Hungerman v. Keiser University, Brooke Decker, Kimberly Presto, John Doe 1-100, Amberlyn Gentry and Estate of Harold TrindleDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2026
- Menoken v. LipnicDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018