Legal Opinion
Jasmine Hungerman v. Keiser University, Brooke Decker, Kimberly Presto, John Doe 1-100, Amberlyn Gentry and Estate of Harold Trindle
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided July 20, 2026No. 8:21-cv-00318Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION JASMINE HUNGERMAN, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 8:21-cv-318-MSS-JSS KEISER UNIVERSITY, BROOKE DECKER, KIMBERLY PRESTO, JOHN DOE 1-100, AMBERLYN GENTRY and ESTATE OF HAROLD TRINDLE, Defendants. ORDER THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, (Dkt. 57), Plaintiff’s response in opposition thereto, (Dkt. 61), and Defendants’ reply in support. Upon consideration of all relevant filings, case law, and being otherwise fully advised, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bill Clark Herbert Futch Austin Hurst Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.