Legal Opinion

Moyer v. Packard Motor Car Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1919No. Docket No. 78PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Mary Moyer presented her claim for compensation against the Packard Motor Car Company for the accidental death of her son in defendant’s employ. From an order awarding compensation, defendant brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

Claimant’s decedent, Edward Moyer, was a night watchman employed by the defendant. He had been so employed for eight days. The buildings of defendant’s plant are numbered, one building, known as No. 15, was five stories high. In this building it was Moyer’s duty to act as night watchman of the third, fourth and fifth floors. In building No. 15 was an elevator, used for freight only, which ran from the first to the fifth floor. Moyer reported to the foreman of the watchmen at the front gate of the plant at about 5:30 o’clock on the morning of March 17. He was last seen by any one who gave…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Papinaw v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Wishcaless v. Hammond, Standish & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Twin Peaks Canning Co. v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Gacesa v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Pacific Employers Insurance v. ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Detwiler v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Gabriel v. A. J. Smith Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API