Papinaw v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to the- Industrial Accident Board. Rose Papinaw presented her claim against the Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada for compensation for the killing of her husband. From an award made, the respondent corporation brings certiorari.
1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.
The husband of applicant, Alfred Papinaw, who had been for several years section foreman for respondent, was killed during the night of January 30, 1914, on its track between his residence and what is called the Tunnel depot of respondent’s road in the city of Port Huron. On her application *443for compensation under' Act No. 10, Pub. Acts 1912 (Extra Session), the Michigan Industrial Accident Board found that his death arose out of and in the course of his employment, and therefore awarded her the full compensation provided in such cases.
The known facts and circumstances relating to Papinaw’s…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- St. Louis, Arkansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WelchTexas Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by37 opinions
- Flint v. City of EldonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Mailman's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
- Meyers v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Morgan v. Butte Central Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1920
- Spring Canyon Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1921
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.