Robinson v. Washington National Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The question presented for determination will be controlled by a construction of the policy sued on. In construing contracts, “The cardinal rule of construction is to ascertain the intention of the parties. If that intention be clear, and it contravenes no rule of law, and sufficient words be used to arrive at the intention, it shall be enforced, irrespective of all technical or arbitrary rules of construe tion.” Code, § 20-702. “The contract of insurance should be construed so as to carry out the true intention of the parties.” § 56-815. It was said by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Quillian v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Great American Indemnity Co. v. Southern Feed Stores Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Fisher v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Marbut v. Empire Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Morris Plan Bank v. GinnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance Co. v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. Mosaic Tile Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- American Motorists Insurance v. VermontCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- National Life & Accident Insurance v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Continental Casualty Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987