Legal Opinion
M.A.P. Oil Co. v. Texaco Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 9, 1982No. 80-4259PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
This action was filed by twenty-five wholesale gasoline distributors and commission agents, alleging antitrust and regulatory violations by Texaco Inc. (“Texaco”) in the marketing of Texaco gasoline. The regulatory claims allege violations of the Mandatory Petroleum Allocation and Price Regulations, 10 C.F.R. §§ 210-12, promulgated under the Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act of 1973. 15 U.S.C. §§ 751-760h. The antitrust claims allege actual and attempted monopolization under § 2 of the Sherman Act. 15 U.S.C. § 2. This appeal by fourteen of the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Berkey Photo, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Eastman Kodak Company, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- California Computer Products, Inc. And Century Data Systems, Inc., Plaintiffs v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Pressure Vessels of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Empire GasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
- Bruce Gilchrist v. Jim Slemons Imports, Inc., and Jim SlemonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Coastal Fuels of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Caribbean Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Thurman Industries, Inc. v. Pay 'N Pak Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Hershel CLADY, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.