Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Martin

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 7, 1917No. 20,754PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Doniphan district court; William I. Stuart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

W. G. Hammond died leaving a will purporting to devise a life interest in property to his wife, with a remainder to their five children, a provision being added that if any of them should die “before the inheritance passes to them” the child or children of such deceased child should take his share. One of the testator’s children, Lura Hammond, died without issue and interstate after his death, and before that of his widow. In an. action for the partition of a part of the property devised the trial court decided that a fifth interest, being…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lachenmyer v. GehlbachIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Bullock v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Cox v. HandyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
  4. Flanagan v. StaplesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. Almand v. AlmandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gardner v. VanlandinghamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  2. Buxton v. NobleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Epperson v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  4. Faris v. NickelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  5. McLean v. StanleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API