Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Vanlandingham

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 14, 1934PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for the construction of a will and for partition of the residuary estate disposed of thereby. The case was tried by the court, without a jury, upon an agreed statement of facts. John A. Vanlandingham (hereinafter called the testator) made the will in question on November 22, 1919. By this will the testator left to his wife absolutely $2500 in cash and his residence in Plattsburg. The remainder of his estate he disposed of as follows:

"FOURTH. I direct that my wife, Lovie Vanlandingham, shall have the use and benefit of all the rest, residue and remainder of my estate real,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. McArthur v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Doe v. ConsidineSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  3. Carstensen's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Trautz v. LempSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  5. Dingley v. DingleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Housman v. LewellenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  2. Commerce Trust Company v. WeedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. McDougal v. McDougalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. KaltenbachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  5. Norman v. HortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API