Legal Opinion
Hunt v. County of Shasta
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 19, 1990No. C005922PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTLAND, J.
Having decided to sell portions of their property located in Shasta County, plaintiffs asked defendants for a determination that the property complied with the Subdivision Map Act.
Government Code section 66499.35 provides that, upon the request of an owner of real property, the county board of supervisors shall determine whether the property complies with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. (Gov. Code, § 66410 et seq.; further statutory references are to this code unless otherwise specified.) If the board determines that the property complies, it must issue a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- American Airlines, Inc. v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Fairbank v. City of Mill ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.