Legal Opinion
United States v. Thomas M. Acklen
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 22, 1982No. 81-5544PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONTIE, Circuit Judge.
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731, the government appeals the granting of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained during the course of an inspection of his pharmacy conducted in accordance with 21 U.S.C. § 880. Defendant, who operates his own pharmacy, was indicted on 46 counts of forging prescriptions required to be kept on record under the Controlled Substances Act and of obtaining Schedule II drugs by means of a forged prescription, both in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843.
Title II of the Federal Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 (The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Estado Libre Asociado v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1984
- State v. GirdlerArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. NorrisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Stone v. City of StowOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- United States v. Roberto Dominguez-PrietoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.