Legal Opinion

Millen v. Tennessee Department of Labor & Workforce Development

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 18, 2006No. W2005-02688-COA-R3-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · FarmerDavid R. Farmer, J.

in which W. FRANK CRAWFORD, P.J., W.S., and HOLLY M. KIRBY, J., joined.

The Appellant filed a claim for unemployment benefits which was denied. Appellant petitioned for judicial review in the chancery court and that court affirmed the decision of the Board of Review. Appellant next appealed to this Court and we affirm the court below.

The appellant, Kevin Millen, filed a claim for unemployment benefits with the Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development (Agency). The Agency held that Mr. Millen was not eligible for benefits because he did not earn sufficient wages during the…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. State Board of EqualizationTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Armstrong v. NeelCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  3. Ford v. TraughberCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  4. Perryman v. BibleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Administrative Management Resources, LLC v. James G. NeeleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015
  2. Clementine Newman v. Karla Davis, Commissioner of Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development, and Memphis Light, Gas, and WaterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
  3. Kevin Millen v. Shelby County District Attorney OfficeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
  4. Ruby Blackmon v. Eaton ElectricalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API