Legal Opinion
Ford v. Traughber
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided March 13, 1991PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LEWIS, Judge.
Appellant Christine Ford applied to the Tennessee Department of Employment Security for unemployment compensation benefits. The Board of Review denied appellant’s claim after finding that appellant “is not able and available for work under T.C.A. § 50-7-302(a)(4).” The trial court affirmed the decision of the Board of Review after determining that there was “substantial material evidence in the record to support the Board’s decision.”
On appeal, appellant contends that the Board of Review found, and the trial court affirmed, that appellant was not entitled to benefits…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. State Board of EqualizationTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- Armstrong v. NeelCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
- Weaver v. WallaceTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- Cawthron v. ScottTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- Miles v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Ford v. Tennessee Student Assistance Corp. (In Re Ford)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1993
- Millen v. Tennessee Department of Labor & Workforce DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
- ARI, Inc. v. James G. Neeley, Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012
- Administrative Management Resources, LLC v. James G. NeeleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015
- Carolyn Phelps v. Michael McGill, Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.