Legal Opinion

Highland Springs Conference & Training Center v. City of Banning

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 2016No. E060915PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.—

I. INTRODUCTION

In these consolidated California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) actions, several plaintiffs, including plaintiffs and appellants Highland Springs Conference and Training Center (Highland Springs) and Banning Bench Community of Interest Association (Banning Bench) successfully challenged the certification by defendant and respondent, City of Banning (the City), of an environmental impact report (EIR) for a 1,500-acre real estate development project known as the Black Bench project. In their writ petitions, filed in November…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Mesler v. Bragg Management Co.California Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Krolikowski v. San Diego City Employees' Ret. Sys., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Hearn Pacific Corp. v. Second Generation Roofing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Parker v. Parker (In re Albert), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. 21st Century Financial Services, LLC v. Manchester Financial BankDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
  5. 347 Group, Inc. v. Philip Hawkins Architect, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2020

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API