Legal Opinion

Burrow v. Jones

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 21, 1981No. 8019SC798PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Plaintiff contends the court erred in granting defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. In considering a motion for a directed verdict, the trial court must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-movant, deeming all evidence which tends to support his position to be true, resolving all evidentiary conflicts favorably to him and giving him the benefit of all inferences reasonably to be drawn in his favor. Daughtry v. Turnage, 295 N.C. 543, 246 S.E. 2d 788 (1978); Ryder v. Benfield, 43 N.C. App. 278, 258 S.E. 2d 849 (1979).

The trial court in this case…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clark v. BodycombeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Daughtry v. TurnageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Watson Seafood & Poultry Co. v. George W. Thomas, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Harrington v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Ryder v. BenfieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clark v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API