Legal Opinion

Clark v. Moore

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1983No. 826SC1306PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendants ask us to find that the trial judge erred in denying their motions for directed verdict and in denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Defendants contend that plaintiffs evidence as to defendants’ negligence was not sufficient to submit the case to the jury and that plaintiffs own evidence showed contributory negligence as a matter of law. We do not agree with either contention.

Defendants’ motion for directed verdict under Rule 50(a) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure and defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Daughtry v. TurnageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Wilson v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Burrow v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Broyhill v. CoppageCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Maxwell v. Michael P. Doyle, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Herring v. Food Lion, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Smith v. PassCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Allen v. PullenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API