Legal Opinion
Kelly v. Albertsen
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 26, 2009No. AC 28932PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The issue presented in this case is whether the trial court improperly failed to allow the plaintiff, Robert J. Kelly, to conduct discovery prior to ruling on the motion to dismiss filed by the defendant, Peter C. Albertsen, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
For the underlying facts of the plaintiffs appeal we turn to our Supreme Court’s opinion in a related case. “In September, 1995, the plaintiff sought medical treatment from [the defendant], a physician employed by the [University of Connecticut Health Center (health…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Peabody, N.E., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Amore v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Angersola v. Radiologic Assocs. of Middletown, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Bartlett v. Metropolitan District CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Devine v. FusaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020