Legal Opinion
Bartlett v. Metropolitan District Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 23, 2010No. AC 31231PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WEST, J.
The plaintiff, William Bartlett, appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion filed by the defendant, the Metropolitan District Commission (commission), to dismiss his negligence action. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the claim was governed by General Statutes § 13a-149, which requires him to provide notice to the commission, (2) failed to hold an evidentiary hearing prior to granting the commission’s motion to dismiss and (3) considered the commission’s assertion of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lawrence H. Ramming v. United States of America, John Thomas Cloud v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Amodio v. AmodioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Amore v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Conboy v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Giannoni v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Cuozzo v. Town of OrangeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Northeast Builders Supply & Home Centers, LLC v. RMM Consulting, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Bartlett v. Metropolitan District CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Bartlett v. Metropolitan District CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.