Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Jarvis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1962No. Docket 61, Calendar 48,873PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

Plaintiff, suing the defendant police officers, charged in separate counts assault and battery, false arrest, and malicious prosecution. The trial judge instructed the jury to find against plaintiff with respect to the counts alleging false arrest and malicious prosecution. The tried issue of assault and battery was submitted to the jury and resulted in a verdict for plaintiff, against all defendants, in the sum of $137. He appeals from judgment entered upon such verdict, alleging that elimination of the above counts from jury consideration constituted reversible error.

Having concluded that 6…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dockery v. Central Arizona Light & Power Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Tarantino v. GriebelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Doak v. SpringsteadMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fondren v. Klickitat CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  2. House v. AneHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Wisniski v. OngArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Fisher v. Maas Bros.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  5. House v. AneHawaii Supreme Court · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API