Legal Opinion

Wisniski v. Ong

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1963No. 7048PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

This action was originally commenced in August of 19SS by appellant, Ann Ruth Wisniski, against Roland Ong doing business as Roland’s Market, Luis Meza, his employee, and others for false arrest and malicious prosecution. Following a trial and a verdict in favor of appellant, the trial court entered judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of appellees. On appeal, Wisniski v. Ong, 84 Ariz. 372, 329 P.2d 1097, we said that the evidence while not sufficient to sustain a verdict for false imprisonment under the then existing state of the record was sufficient to sustain…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Topolewski v. Plankinton Packing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Bealmear v. Southern Cal. Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Moore v. Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Broussard v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  5. Adams v. BicknellIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sundeen v. KrogerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Fondren v. Klickitat CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  3. Visco v. First National Bank of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. Creamer v. RaffetyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. Frank Garza Martinez, III v. City of Mesa, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API