Tarantino v. Griebel
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
The issue raised by this appeal is whether a conviction which is superseded by an acquittal on appeal after a trial de novo is conclusive of the existence of probable cause in a subsequent action for malicious prosecution.
To be successful in an action for malicious prosecution the plaintiff must allege and has the burden of proving that the defendant had no probable cause for instituting the proceedings against him. Lack of probable cause is only one of the essential elements to such cause of action. Elmer v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co. (1950), 257 Wis. 228, 43 N. W. (2d) 244; Gladfelter v. Doemel…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Crescent City Live Stock Co. v. Batchers' Union Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Topolewski v. Plankinton Packing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Hanser v. BieberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
- Randol v. Kline's IncorporatedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- Skeffington v. EylwardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sundeen v. KrogerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- House v. AneHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
- Bumphus v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- Krieg v. Dayton-Hudson Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Adcox v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.