Legal Opinion
In Re Special Investigation No. 231
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 8, 1983No. [No. 91, September Term, 1982.]PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
We shall here turn back an attempt by the Attorney General of Maryland to use the Code of Professional Responsibility to prevent individuals from being represented by counsel of their choice. Hence, we shall affirm the order of Judge Milton B. Allen in the Criminal Court of Baltimore, now the Circuit Court for Baltimore City.
I
Pursuant to a directive from the Governor of Maryland issued under Maryland Constitution Art. V, § 3 (a) (2), the Attorney General for some extended period of time has been engaged in investigations pertaining to certain health care providers. He has set up what is known…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Matter of DoyleNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- United States v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Los Angeles Rams Football Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Apodaca v. ViramontesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Douglas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Sigma Reproductive Health Center v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Myers v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Unnamed Attorney v. Attorney Grievance CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Goodwich v. NolanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.