Legal Opinion

City of Wilber v. Bednar

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1932No. 28118PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carter, District Judge.

This is an action brought by the city of Wilber against Albert Bednar and other defendants under section 17-409, Comp. St. 1929, for the purpose of annexing certain territory belonging to each of said defendants. From a decree of the trial court finding against the defendants and annexing the territory of each to the city, the defendants Adolph B. Sobotka, Edward H. Vosika, Anton Vit, Emil Fuchs, and Anna Bruha bring the case to this court on appeal.

The decree of the trial court is assailed as being wholly unsupported by the evidence. The testimony is to the effect that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hammond v. DimondNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. State v. Delaware-Hickman Ditch Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Village of Hartington v. LugeNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  4. City of Wahoo v. TharpNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Village of Syracuse v. MapesNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lackaff v. BogueNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Jack v. TeegardenNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Olson v. City of WahooNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Cunningham v. Armour & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  5. George v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API