Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance v. Coppersmith
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided November 24, 1978PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph Rosenzweig,. J.
Action for breach of contract of insurance. Both sides have moved for summary judgment. Defendants’ motion granted, plaintiff’s motion denied.
From the papers submitted it appears that plaintiff State Farm Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as State Farm) paid out no-fault benefits of $3,787.82 to its insureds, the defendants herein, who had been involved in an auto accident on July 14, 1975.
Subsequently, the insureds settled the personal injury aspect of their case for $3,300, said sum serving as compensation for the pain and suffering…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Royal Globe Insurance v. ConnollyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Spitaleri v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1975
- Sinicropi v. State Farm InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Government Employees Insurance Company, Government Employees Insurance Company v. John Rozmyslowicz, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- Michael Ganley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Barnhart v. Branch Motor Lines, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1980
- Woodbine v. We Try Harder, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1984