Legal Opinion

Barnhart v. Branch Motor Lines, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Charles B. Swartwood, J.

These are motions addressed to the verdicts in favor of the *48plaintiffs following a trial. Liability was conceded by the defendants and the trial was limited to the issue of damages.

However, there are several issues as to how the limitations under subdivision 1 of section 673 and subdivision 1 of section 671 of the Insurance Law on recovery of “basic economic loss” are to be applied to the verdicts. All parties were “covered persons” under the “no-fault” insurance law so that the plaintiffs were not entitled to recover for “basic economic loss”…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Israel v. Wood Dolson Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. In re the Arbitration between Adams & Government Employees InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance v. CoppersmithCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnston v. ColvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Pascente v. StoyleRochester City Court · 1982
  3. Goodkin v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API