Legal Opinion
Royal Globe Insurance v. Connolly
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 12, 1976PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order and judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs and judgment entered in favor of respondent Connolly in accordance with the following memorandum: James Connolly, the victim of a hit-and-run-accident, was covered under an automobile insurance policy issued by Royal Globe Insurance Company to one Margaret Dolan. Following the accident, Connolly made a claim pursuant to the "Personal Injury Protection Endorsement” (no-fault) of the policy for medical bills and lost earnings. Pursuant to this claim Royal Globe paid Connolly the sum of $7,250.84. Thereafter, Connolly served a demand…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Adams & Government Employees InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- In re the Arbitration between Hutchison & Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Connolly v. O'MalleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
3Cited by16 opinions
- Scinta v. KazmierczakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JackoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Stuyvesant InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Celona v. Royal Globe InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Staten v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.