Legal Opinion
Beneficial Ohio, Inc. v. Primero, L.L.C.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 31, 2006No. Nos. C-040895 and C-060063PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gokman, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Beneficial Ohio, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the trial court confirming the sheriffs sale of real property located at 11549 Lincolnshire Drive (“the property”) and from an entry overruling a motion to vacate the sale. Because we find that Beneficial’s right to due process was violated when defendant-appellee, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”), failed to notify Beneficial of the date, time, and place of the sale under R.C. 2329.26(A), we reverse the judgment of the trial court confirming the sale of the property and remand…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. IshmailOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Akron-Canton Regional Airport Authority v. SwinehartOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- In re Foreclosure of Liens for Delinquent TaxesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Bosworth v. St. Louis Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Central Trust Co. v. JensenOhio Supreme Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jontony v. ColegroveOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Fifth Third Mtge., Co. v. RankinOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. WycheOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Karwowska v. St. Michael Hosp., 90041 (8-21-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Kohrman v. Cincinnati Zoning Board of Appeals, C-060704 (7-6-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.