Legal Opinion

Akron-Canton Regional Airport Authority v. Swinehart

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1980No. 79-489PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaul W. Brown, J.

The sole issue before this court is whether service of process was effectively made upon the appellees. In resolving this issue we look first to Civ. R. 4.1(1), governing service by certified mail.1 The rule speaks primarily *405to how service shall be made, rather than where, or to whom process may be served. In drafting these rules it was believed that due process should determine the parameters for proper service rather than create unduly restrictive rules prohibiting otherwise constitutionally permissible service. Although the flexible nature of due process prevents hard and fast rules, we…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Carl Thomas Rauch, III v. Day and Night Manufacturing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  3. Sharp v. Valley Forge Medical Center & Heart Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Nathaniel P. Broussard v. Columbia Gulf Transmission CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  5. In re Foreclosure of Liens for Delinquent TaxesOhio Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Sill v. Sweeney (In Re Sweeney)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  2. Fancher v. FancherOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Samson Sales, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Bell v. Midwestern Educational Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Knickerbocker Properties, Inc. XLII v. Delaware County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2008

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API