Legal Opinion

In re Foreclosure of Liens for Delinquent Taxes

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1980No. 79-439PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaul W. Brown, J.

Appellant challenges the notice provisions for tax lien foreclosures embodied in R. C. 5721.18(B) on the basis that such provisions are facially violative of due *335process requirements imposed by the Fourteenth Amendment. Appellant also contends, in the alternative, that if the statute comports with due process, he was nonetheless denied his constitutional right to notice by the appellee’s failure to adhere to the statute. For reasons stated herein, we reject appellant’s first contention and agree with the second.

The statute in issue, R. C. 5721.18(B), provides, in its most pertinent parts, as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Castellano v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Akron-Canton Regional Airport Authority v. SwinehartOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Cincinnati Insurance v. EmgeOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Samson Sales, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Bell v. Midwestern Educational Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. United Home Federal v. RhonehouseOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API