Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Elliott

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 4, 2001No. 25356Published

1Dissent

PLEICONES, Justice:

I respectfully dissent, and would affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals as modified. In my opinion, fairness to the bench and bar requires that we adopt a lesser included offense test that applies to all cases and not utilize an ad hoc approach. The majority holds that the first step in any greater-lesser analysis is the application of the “elements test,” and that where that test fails to yield the desired result, we may conclude that the offense should be considered a lesser as an “anomaly.” In my view, this rule does not provide for the stability and predictability…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. State v. ElmoreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. KornahrensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. HiottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. LocklairSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API