State v. Elliott
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Dissent
PLEICONES, Justice:
I respectfully dissent, and would affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals as modified. In my opinion, fairness to the bench and bar requires that we adopt a lesser included offense test that applies to all cases and not utilize an ad hoc approach. The majority holds that the first step in any greater-lesser analysis is the application of the “elements test,” and that where that test fails to yield the desired result, we may conclude that the offense should be considered a lesser as an “anomaly.” In my view, this rule does not provide for the stability and predictability…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- State v. ElmoreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- State v. KornahrensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- State v. HiottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- State v. LocklairSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.