City of Arlington v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
*293 We consider whether an agency's interpretation of a statutory ambiguity that concerns the scope of its regulatory authority (that is, its jurisdiction) is entitled to deference under Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 , 104 S.Ct. 2778 , 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984).
I
Wireless telecommunications networks require towers and antennas; proposed sites for those towers and antennas must be approved by local zoning authorities. In the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Congress "impose[d] specific limitations on the traditional authority of state and local governments…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment; Dissent.
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by631 opinions
- Kisor v. WilkieSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Pereira v. SessionsSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection BureauSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
626 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.