Legal Opinion

Tonahill v. Legrand Johnson Construction Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1998No. 23638PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILAK, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Industrial Commission (the Commission) that the claimant’s worker’s compensation claim was time barred under Idaho Code § 72-706(1) or alternatively under I.C. § 72-701. We vacate the decision of the Commission and remand for further proceedings.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On August 3, 1993, Carolyn Tonahill (Tonahill) was allegedly injured at her workplace, LeGrand Johnson Construction Company (LeGrand), while operating a motorized broom. Later that same day, Tonahill reported the accident to her project supervisor, Duane Smith.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ada County Assessor v. Roman Catholic Diocese of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Brooks v. Standard Fire InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Murray-Donahue v. National Car Rental Licensee Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Reedy v. M.H. King Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
  5. McAlpin v. Wood River Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mulder v. Liberty Northwest InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. SchumacherIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Perkins v. Croman, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API