Legal Opinion

State v. Schumacher

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 2001No. 25194PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

The State brings this interlocutory appeal from the» district court’s order suppressing much of the evidence upon which the State relied in charging the defendant with trafficking in marijuana. The defendant cross-appeals from orders denying his motion to dismiss the case on the ground that the statute under which he is charged is unconstitutionally vague and denying his motion to quash the order binding him over for trial.

I

Joey Schumacher came to the attention of law enforcement as a result of an informant’s tip indicating that Schumacher might be growing marijuana in a barn…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. GutierrezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. State v. GarciaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. People v. VenturaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. PersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. State v. PalmerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API